How can someone guarantee that chiranjeevi can do good for our state, just because he was running charitable blood and eye bank, if he is an hero on the silver screen,,  not necessarily he will do the same heroism in the real life as well, Politics is not a childs play as everybody knows,, though chiranjeevi is very new to politics he has to learn many things in this profession, not like entering politics just for the heck of entering or for something else, even if he is given a chance to rule the state i am sure he cannot make his own decisions and mostly depend on others which is very true.     Answered by: azeem7860

Here its not the point of comparsion... But what Chiru will do to AP...

He cannot rule the state because, even if he wants to do it good, people around him won't allow him to do good.

How can you say that he is a good CM since he kept blood bank.

The state doesnt require the ruling, it requires the development. As Chiru will be a dependent on many people around him to do good work unlike Chandrababu or YSR as he has no experience.

I prefer Chandrababu than YSR as Chandrababu can take his own decisions on the state development.

We need to select the most powerful individual ruler.

 We are very much aware of Chiru's contributions to the society through his blood bank, eye bank and so on....

And more than all he had got thousands of blood brothers who will be always in support to him...

By considering all these things, we can say that Chiru will rule the state of AP better than anyone...